Digital Media’s Influence on CPG Sales

Posted by Brian Cavoli on February 8th, 2012 in , ,

A new study dunnhumby with Accenture and ComScore shows how important a brand’s online presence is to in-store sales.  They found that when consumers visit a brand’s website to learn about products, offers and relevant content, they are much better customers.

Shoppers who have visited a brand’s website spend 37% more money with the brand and 53% more in the category than non-visitors. The following chart shows how website visitors compare against non-visitors in these key shopping behaviors. Non-visitors are represented by an index of 100.

  • Monthly brand spending – Websites are a very powerful influence. Visitors spend 37% more with the brand in the retail store. The study found that the length of time visitors spend on the site is was the key determinant of their likelihood to purchase the brand in the store. What makes a website effective?  The most important factor is fresh content that is updated frequently. Content that provides reasons to buy the brand, product ratings and user generated content are all effective at increasing time spent on the site.
  • Category spend – Website visitors are educated in the category and likely to make many purchases in the category with multiple brands.  These consumers spend 53% more money in the category.
  • Brand units – Since they spending more money, it makes sense that they are filling their shopping cart with 48% more products.
  • Category price per unit – It’s interesting to note that these are savvy shoppers. They pay slightly less per unit than non-website visitors. They know where to look for discounts, and the web is a great place to find offers.

There is obviously great untapped potential here.

“The  research highlights the significant yet underutilized potential of brand websites and digital communications as key drivers for building customer loyalty and preference for CPG brands.”

“Since website visitors have higher affinity to the brand and the overall product category, there is an opportunity for brand marketers to drive loyalty through personalizing the website experience, catering to the preferences of their best customers.”   – John LaRocca, Vice President, Strategic Partnerships at dunnhumbyUSA

 

While this study isn’t specific to social media, it points to the quality of a brand’s presence across the entire internet.Most brand websites feature their Facebook and Twitter sites prominently. A few of the brand websites, like Skittles.com and Snickers.com, seem to exist just to pull people into their Facebook pages.  It’s a great approach. Instead of just linking people to a Wall or offer page, they deliver a high-impact brand experience on the website and give customers reasons to dig deeper into the activities and conversation on Facebook.

The survey was conducted over a 6 month period by dunnhumby, Accenture and ComScore.  ComScore tracked the online activities of a million web users in the US (with permission of course) and the data was matched against dunnhumby’s in-store shopping data. Accenture looked at websites of CPG brands to evaluate the common components of the most successful websites.

Get your copy from dunnhumby here.

ReTweet

New Video: Why Agents Do What They Do

Posted by Brian Cavoli on February 6th, 2012 in , ,

We hope you’ve been enjoying AgentBzz, our new blog feature that shines a light on our amazing Agents each week.  Agents are a lot like any other consumer, but they love to talk about brands and share their experiences with the world.  It’s part of how they are wired.  I think it is interesting to see what attracts them to BzzAgent, what they like, and why they do what they do.

A few of our Agents came by our office recently to talk about this with us. We captured some of their comments in this new video:

ReTweet

AgentBzz: Meet Liesl

Posted by Haley Brennan on February 3rd, 2012 in , , ,

Tell us a little about yourself and your family

I have been married to a wonderful man, John, for 14 years. He’s a TERRIFIC cook and Dad to our adopted daugher, Kadence. Kady came home with us from China almost 3 years ago and is the love of our lives. She has 3 sets of grandparents and family across the country (New Mexico, Alaska, Florida, Ohio, Michigan, Colorado…) who adore her.

Why do you like being a BzzAgent?

I love testing out the products! I’ve always been a “feedback” kind of person, happy to call a company and let them know a) their product is awesome or, b) there was an issue. Companies won’t know what we think unless they hear from us directly. BzzAgent is a great service for both companies AND consumers. I’ve raved about so many of the items I’ve tried that many of my friends are now loyal consumers.

What have been some of your favorite BzzCampaigns and why?

I’ve loved the cosmetic campaigns, specifically the eye cream and makeup campaigns. As I’m getting older I’m always looking for products to help me age more “gracefully,” but I loathe spending a lot of money if I don’t even know if the product works. Via the BzzAgent campaigns, I’ve become a big fan of the Covergirl Age Defying products!

What makes you want to talk about a product? How do you Bzz?

If I love or loathe a product, I’ll shout it to the world because personal experience is the BEST unbiased information out there.  I Bzz: Face-to-Face over coffee, email, via my Blog & Facebook.

If you were stranded on a deserted island, what 3 CDs would you bring? 

“Love Stinks” by J Giles Band; “The Meditative Chopin” by Roy Eaton and “Very Best of Daryl Hall & John Oates” by Hall & Oates. “Love Stinks” is outstanding! Not a bad song on it and good for a laugh (which you’d need alone on a deserted island!). I’ve been a fan of Hall & Oates for alomst 30 years and wouldn’t want to be without them…ever. And “The Meditative Chopin” is my FAVORITE classical music album of all time. Really helps calm you down when things are stressful.

If you could have dinner with any 3 people living or dead, who would they be?

Stephen King – The guy writes some amazing books (where does he come up with this stuff?!) AND plays in a band. Seems to me to be the ideal guest for a lively dinner!

Angelina Jolie – She seems to be well read and charming, which makes for an excellent dinner guest. Plus. we could swap adoption stories AND my daughter would have some kids to play with!

Martin Luther King – The guy took on the Pope & the Catholic Church, was excommunicated, married a former nun, translated the Bible into the language of the people (instead of just Latin), founded a church and was a prolific writer of hymns. I know tradition says to avoid discussion of religion in social situations but this guy would be a fascinating, educated guest!

Thanks for the chance to do some hard thinking, BzzAgent! Looking forward to more campaigns!!

ReTweet

Mobile Phones at the Point-of-Purchase

Posted by Brian Cavoli on February 2nd, 2012 in , ,

New research from Pew Internet show just how important mobile phones are to shoppers when they are in the store about to make a purchase.  Not only are consumers using their phones to compare prices at other retailers, they are looking up reviews of the products staring back at them from the shelf.

The report ”The Rise of In-store Mobile Commerce” Pew found that during the last holiday season, 52% of adult cell phone owners used their phone in the store to help make a purchase decisions.  If you thought they were standing there banging away on their phones to text their kids in the food court, you might be surprised to see that they were actually conducting some serious point-of-purchase research. The study found:

  • 24% looked up online reviews
  • 25% gathered price comparisons  (19% of them went ahead and bought the product online when they were in the store)

These shoppers tend to be younger (age 18-49), live in urban areas and have incomes above $50,000.

Online price comparisons are going to happen. As mobile sites get better and as new apps make price aggregation easier, this behavior is only going to increase. But it’s not always all about price.  Pew’s data shows that as many people are looking up product reviews as are checking prices at Amazon or apps like myShopanion. But they’re not looking for ads and company websites. They are checking with friends on social networks and searching for product reviews from other customers to get the info they need to feel confident about a purchase. Building customer advocacy is one area where marketers can influence, and it should be a primary focus.

Filling the web with authentic discussion from customers about quality, efficacy and value is the best way to fight the price war you can’t always control.  The story is even stronger when those discussions include photos of the product in use and demonstration videos.A study last fall from Web Liquid found that social media posts with photos had engagement rates higher than any other type of post.

We are encouraging our Agents to use mobile devices as often as possible to share product opinions and experiences.  Some of our Agents, like busy moms, use smartphones as their primary connection to the web and their social networks. Having an iPhone app not only enables them to share detailed product experiences as it happens, it’s integration with the iPhone’s high-quality camera make it easier than ever to post the personal videos and photos of the product experience in the store and at home with their families. This is the kind of stuff that will get a product into the shopping cart.

Got the app? If not, try it here: http://www.bzzagent.com/pg/iPhone

ReTweet

Inc Magazine: Know Thy Enemy, Befriend Rivals

Posted by Brian Cavoli on February 1st, 2012 in

This is a cross-post of an article by Dave Balter published here on Inc Magazine.

Scrutinize your competitors, and become friends with them, too. You just might partner to pitch a client, buy one out (or vice versa), or grow the industry together.

 

Here’s a truth:  At BzzAgent, the word-of-mouth marketing firm where I’m CEO, I go to ridiculous extremes to obtain information about our competitors.

I scan Crunchbase, study websites, and download mobile apps. I troll shamelessly for gossip about our rivals’ executive teams and star players.  And occasionally—when I’m really on my game—I hit pay dirt and obtain a competitor’s proposal to a client. And when that happens, our team goes to work.  We dissect it for valuable bits of information about our opponents’ pricing models, positioning, and capabilities.  And it’s this information that allows us to accelerate our innovation, understand where our competitors are strong—and determine how we can exploit their weaknesses.

For instance, from one proposal we learned that our flat-fee model was being devalued by another company’s “cost-per-engagement” pricing. We created a strategy to counter that objection with clients and prospects. And a few years ago, we got the inside scoop on a new opponent’s practice of throwing in-home product-distribution parties for marketers and got ahead of market by developing the next evolution of the concept.

We’re also interested in information about our competitors’ processes.  For a while, one rival company responded to email queries by tersely exclaiming that they only accepted clients who had a minimum of $1 million to spend.  Hey, we were happy to accept those that ‘just missed’ that criteria.  In another case, a company that tracks social influence positioned itself as a competitor to us—but inside information proved that their engineering-first culture could be perceived as unfriendly to clients.  Our awareness of that issue was the foundation for a very lucrative partnership discussion.

Sun Tsu said it best:  “…know thy enemy.”  As a strategy, this means more than the collection and dissection of as much information on your competitors as possible.  Alongside minor cloak-and-dagger data gathering, you should also be developing real, personal relationships with people at all levels of your competitor’s businesses.  Just as much value—possibly even more—can come from a direct relationship.  Why not identify and tackle common challenges and goals? Growing an industry is often about the sum of its parts. With a rival, you might create standards or align to compete against a regulation. Heck, you may even partner to win a big client.

And if you’re leading an organization and aren’t similarly fixated on both knowledge-gathering strategies, you are putting your company at great risk.

I wasn’t always so obsessed. At one time, I thought BzzAgent was untouchable. I believed we could always stay one step ahead of the competition.  I was convinced that what we did was often right and what our rivals did was often wrong.  Of course we would continue to evolve and they would remain static.  But I was wrong.

Many a corporate pundit will tell you to just focus on your own business. Don’t get distracted by the competition, they will say. In our case, we were so focused on ourselves that we failed to look up in time to see how things had evolved.   We were the first entrant into the space in 2001, and for many years we were considered the only game in town.  We didn’t have to outpitch anyone.  We just had to be us.  When competitors finally showed up around 2005, we mocked the fact that they weren’t nearly as knowledgeable as we were.  We were confident they lacked our experience.  We thought their variations on our model wouldn’t significantly impact us.  But by 2008, we found ourselves losing more projects than we were winning.  Competitors had learned how to pitch against us.  Their innovations weren’t to be mocked; they were to be admired.

I realize now that this happened because competition is different today than it was just a few decades ago.  Business in general is moving much faster and ideas can be replicated on the cheap.  Competitors—and even companies not yet in your space—will adapt and learn and find ways to become better than you.  They are nimble and they will adapt.  And while they may falter, it’s a much better bet to figure they probably won’t.  Competitors are often smarter than you think they are, and if you turn a blind eye to them—or even blink for a moment—they’re going to eat your lunch.  If you care at all about the organization you’re leading, gathering significant information about your competitors isn’t useful.  It’s not something that might be worth your time.  It’s something you must do.

At Smarterer, a Google-backed startup where I’m executive chair, we watched as Gild, a company that had been only tangentially related to us, deployed an almost-exact replica of our solution, which gives people a score based on how adept they are at things like Excel and PHP and Photoshop.  While initial reactions included hand-wringing and disappointment at being imitated so closely, we eventually settled on a valuable realization: There is no longer first-mover advantage.  This has been replaced by an ability-to-adapt advantage.   For those who are willing to gather as much information as possible, react, and innovate ahead of rapid market shifts, success will be inevitable.  For those who fail to pay attention to everything happening around them, getting overtaken is the only possible outcome.   Yes, it’s still true that if you have a good idea, at least 10 other people are doing the same thing—but now they’re watching you as closely as you should be watching them.

But you shouldn’t consider your competition the evil enemy.  They exist for the very same reason you do, and in most cases rising tides do in fact lift all boats. When it came time to sell BzzAgent (we were acquired by Tesco in July 2011), we had a number of direct competitors that became potential suitors, solely because we had shared a beer at one point or worked together on authoring an ethical code for the industry.  You might not end up as BFFs, but having a competitor as a “frenemy” can be incredibly valuable.

How do you get there? The route to a competitor relationship begins simply: Pick up the phone and call them.   Don’t wait; just do it.  Or actively seek out your competitors at a conference and introduce yourself.  Let them know what you admire about them and offer to share an ingredient in your “secret sauce.”  Follow up and follow through. Send holiday cards; share client stories.  This will break down the barriers that hamper your ability to learn from others and grow your business.  The information you gather will be a critical asset that will help you stay ahead in your industry.

And if a frenemy asks, don’t lie.  You can say, “Yes, we do have copies of your proposals. Know what? I’ll send you one of mine. After all, maybe we can learn something from one another.”

ReTweet

MediaBistro: Brands Score Big Using Social on Game Day

Posted by Brian Cavoli on January 31st, 2012 in ,

This is a cross-post of an Op-Ed appearing here on MediaBistro today.

Our Super Bowl-related submissions continue to roll in, and today, we veer from the party scene to the social one as Brian Cavoli, an MPG/Carat alum who currently serves as director of marketing at WOM shop BzzAgent, discusses social media measurement come game time.

Social media gets a lot of attention this time of year. Early in January, every social media guru shares predictions for the year about what’s ahead for Google+, Facebook and the next great social sensation. Now at the end of the month, Super Bowl advertisers take over with talk about video contests, ad hashtags and Facebook games to extend the life of their message beyond their 30 seconds of glory in the big game.

30 seconds during the Super Bowl goes by fast and it can be easy to miss. Especially if nature calls, or if a chipful of con queso dip spills on your friend’s new sofa (sorry Steve). Advertisers need to make sure their 30 seconds are memorable. But being memorable is hard. Looking at Nielsen’s Top 10 most-recalled Super Bowl ads for each of the last four years shows just how little people remember.  Just four companies – Doritos, Budweiser, GoDaddy and Pepsi – made up 75 percent of the memorable ads during this period. That’s tough competition, kinda like the New England Patriots of advertisers.

So getting people talking about the brand at the water cooler and online across social media is key to making this investment pay off. But how is that payoff calculated?  Any marketer spending $100,000 a second for an ad has some very sophisticated measurement practices in place to determine its business impact. Most are probably using Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM) analysis from Nielsen or other specialists to determine the sales, profitability and ROI of the investment.  Effective marketing is a science and brand managers know exactly what every moving part of their plan is doing to drive sales… except one.   And it’s the one they are relying on to justify the cost for most expensive ad in history.

Social media is often alone in the backfield.  It’s one of the most influential marketing tools there is, yet it isn’t being measured accurately by most marketers.  Everyone tracks “Likes”, fans, followers, retweets, and of course “engagement”. But what does all that really mean? It just represents value. They aren’t financial metrics businesses need to make strategic decisions.  It also makes it impossible to compare social’s impact on the business apples-to-apples with other media.

Social doesn’t have to be an exception. If you use social to help drive sales, it can be measured. BzzAgent has been working with measurement companies including Nielsen, Genpact and Foresight ROI to feed social marketing into the same MMM studies used to evaluate all marketing.  Looking at the results from over 20 studies for leading CPG brands,  we’ve seen on average that social marketing returns an average of $1.50 for every $1 spent. That’s an impressive return. In some cases, the ROI has been as effective as anything in the brand’s marketing mix.

All advertisers know they need an integrated marketing strategy.  Consumers interact with each other and with brands on multiple screens, often at the same time.  We’ll see that more than ever this year since the television broadcast of the game will be streamed online for the first time. Talk about a tweeting paradise. Marketers need to remember that an integrated measurement strategy that includes a financial analysis of social media must go along with it.

If they do, marketers will find that an investment in building social media discussions around a Super Bowl ad will benefit them in two ways.  Not only will the consumer discussions help make the ad more memorable, the investment will shine with a very profitable ROI.

ReTweet

Where Consumers Go, Marketers Will Follow

Posted by Haley Brennan on January 27th, 2012 in , , ,

It’s no surprise that with the increasing popularity of Facebook and Twitter (Facebook usage continued to grow 40% since October 2011), more marketers are also spending more time on these social sites.  As other social sites have started to attract more users, like YouTube and Tumblr, which saw an increase of 172% in audience size from 2010 to 2011, according to a comScore report, marketers have decided to branch out of their social networking comfort zones and join them.

70% of US marketers believe that their next step in social media is to increase their presence across multiple social media platforms, according to an article on eMarketer.  This makes sense since 88% of marketers have already found their way to Facebook and 83% are already active on Twitter.

Facebook can expect to see an additional 6% of those not already engaged on the site, while 8% of non-Tweeters plan to use the site within the coming year. An additional 28% of marketers plan to increase their use of blogs  and 18% want to begin marketing on YouTube.

Sites like Pinterest that are seeing an increase in usage can expect more and more marketers to appear. The site saw a 512% increase in time spent on the site since May 2011.  Pinterest follows right behind Facebook and Tumblr when it comes to time spent on the site and as the trend shows, it is only a matter of time before marketers and brands flock to these sites as well to keep up with their consumers.

 

 

 

ReTweet

What Gets Clicked on Twitter

Posted by Brian Cavoli on January 25th, 2012 in , ,

You think you know a thing or two about using Twitter to promote your product?  If you are using Twitter to drive people to product pages, offers, articles and blog posts, then you need to know what gives you the best chance for success.

Dan Zarella of Hubspot studied this and created a great infographic on how to get more clicks out of Twitter. Here a summary of his findings with a little of our own commentary.

  • Keep tweets between 12 and 130 characters.   This makes a lot of sense. You want to say enough to communicate a compelling thought while leaving enough space for the RT and your username. If you want to be re-tweeted, keep your audience in mind and make it as easy as possible for someone to just click RT.  The more time they have to spend figuring out ways to cut words and spaces to get it down to 140, the less likely they’ll be to do it. An RT should just take a second.
  • Place links about 25% of the way through.  The highest click rates occurred when the link was a quarter of the way into the message.  This was an eye-opener for me. I usually put the link at the end of the tweet so I can use the beginning of the message to build the call to action. But as they say in the newsroom, don’t bury the lead.  The chart shows that you don’t want to start with the link, but get it in the message early.
  • Tweet links a slower pace.  Sending only 1 or 2 links per hour will boost your click rate by as much as 300% compared to more frequent posts.  You don’t want to appear spammy and sending too much of anything becomes noise. Make your tweets count by sending quality links at a slow, but steady basis.
  • Choose the right words. Twitter is a conversation so it’s important to recognize the people you are communicating with.  Tweets mentioning others using the word “via” and @ had click rates in the 6% range, triple the click rate of tweets not using the terms. “RT” and “please” were also well received.  It pays to be polite on Twitter.  On the other hand, the use of “@addthis” and “marketing” actually performed worse than tweets without them.  Think about that the next time you click the share button.  My guess is that many share button tweets prepopulate the language in the post so it becomes a lot less interesting if a lot of people tweeting the same thing the exact same way. My takeaway, be creative.
  • Experiment using paper.li.  If you are not familiar, paper.li is an automated content aggregator on a particular topic.  Content is collected daily based on keywords or hashtags and posts are sent daily with the words “daily is out”. This must create a sense of ugency people can’t resist. According to the study, these gets click rates in the 30% range.  Sounds like it’s time to set one of these up.
  • Use action words: more verbs, fewer nouns.  Tweets with more adverbs and verbs have a much higher click rate than tweets with mostly nouns and adjectives.  This all comes down to being interesting and talking in an active voice. Nouns are passive and boring.
  • Tweet on the weekends.  Tweet click rates jump on Saturday and Sunday. A Sysmos report from 2009 shows that Twitter volume is somewhat lower on the weekend, especially on Sunday.  Seems like when activity is lower, your tweet is more likely to get noticed.
  • Tweet later in the day.  Clicks rates are high at 9am before fading as the morning coffee wears off.  Lunch must energize people because clicks skyrocket to their highest point in the day at 2pm. Rates fade and jump at 5pm and again between 8 and 10pm.  The study doesn’t indicate whether these are east coast times, but I suspect they are.  So I’m sure the popularity of afternoon tweets has a lot to do with the addition of our west coast friends when they come online.  No matter where you live, avoid 2am to 7am. Nobody’s clicking anything then.

This is interesting stuff. Some of these findings have made me re-think some the ways I approach Twitter for marketing. What about you? Lets talk about it at @bzzagent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

ReTweet

AgentBzz: Meet Mari

Posted by Haley Brennan on January 24th, 2012 in , , , ,

Tell us a little about yourself and your family

I am a SAHM of 3 kids ages 13, 9 and 6.  I also am a social worker and am trying to start my own online business.  My husband is an MIT educated Computer Engineer.  My oldest child Gavi,  is a computer whiz like his dad – spends most of his time programing and creating video games to sell on the APP store!  My middle child competes with riding horses (hunter/jumper) and is currently 7th in New England in one of her divisions – pretty good for 9 years old. That is Mimi in the picture with Picasso our pony (more like a big dog!). My youngest, Eli, is a funny kid who loves to play sports and make jokes – life of the party type of guy.  I pretty much live for my kids and do whatever I can to make their lives better.  I am an excellent friend and very intense person.  I hold my beliefs strongly and it can be said that I have an assertive personality (ie: I am bossy!)

Why do you love being a BzzAgent?

I love being a BzzAgent because I get to share my opinions and feel like what I have to say matters.  As a mom, I don’t get to use my intellect that much, but by reviewing items and writing about them, I can at least feel like I am contributing in some way to the world.  Plus it is fun to try new things!  It is like Christmas when I get a new BzzKit in the mail – I love it!

What have been your favorite BzzCampains?

Of course my favorite BzzCampaigns have been the Werther’s Caramels and the Lindor Truffles Campaigns! Super yum!! We LOVE candy and chocolate, so everyone in my life was very grateful to be included in those campaigns – Tasting and reviewing candy? That is like a dream job!  My oldest still has dreams of being an “ice cream taster” as his grown-up job.  By participating in these BzzCampaigns he has the idea that his dreams can come true!! ;)

What makes you want to out a product? How do you Bzz?

I guess I want to  talk about a product when it is either really good or really bad – Both ends of the spectrum get me fired up and want to tell others.  I am really all about advocacy as a social worker and as a mom – I want to stand up and tell people when things need to be improved or if they are already spectacular – Either way people need to know the truth.

What would you do if you were immortal for a day?

You are testing me now… I am in the middle of private High School applications with my oldest child and all were are doing is writing essays like these… oy vey!

If I was immortal for a day, I would change the world. I would want to help as many people as possible – for example, go into drug infested neighborhoods and rescue kids that were being abused (I couldn’t get hurt after all).

I would want to end as much suffering as possible – Would I have other magical powers?  If I did, I would make the leaders of the world just get along already!  No more suicide bombs, no more buses blowing up, and no more people hating others for no real reason – Just work it out already people, will you???

ReTweet

Looking for the ROI of Social? It’s $1.50

Posted by Brian Cavoli on January 23rd, 2012 in , , ,

For every $1 spent, social marketing returns an average of $1.50. That’s what we found after analyzing results from all the Market Mix Modeling (MMM) studies conducted on BzzAgent social marketing campaigns for several of the world’s leading CPG companies.

(Here’s the press release on the study)

The MMM studies were conducted on 21 campaigns by top measurement firms including Nielsen, Genpact and Foresight ROI between 2009 and 2011. We’d love to be able to discuss the companies involved, but as you can imagine, they hold their ROI cards pretty close to the vest. They are valued clients and we respect that. We can say that they are all large CPG companies, including 3 of the top 10, with products sold at retail nationally.

An average ROI of $1.50 for social marketing is great validation about the financial impact social can make on a business. In some cases, the studies have shown that the ROI has been as effective as anything in the brand’s marketing mix. It’s important to look at ROI in the big picture. We know that ROI analysis practices can differ in every company.  So a lower ROI may still represent a very successful campaign when evaluated in the context of the overall marketing plan.  The great thing is that sophisticated analysis like MMM enables you to do that.

If you are not familiar with MMM, it’s considered the gold standard in media measurement. Some of the biggest marketers in the world use it to quantify the drivers of business performance across all marketing channels and activities.  It is a comprehensive process led by specialty measurement firms and it is usually conducted once a year.

What does this all mean? Two things:

1. Social ROI Can Be Measured Accurately.  Social marketing can be measured using the same sophisticated analysis used on all other media investments. Marketers don’t need to make up new metrics or rely on inexact assessments of influence and engagement to evaluate business impact.  Social can be measured apples-to-apples with other media in the marketing mix.

2. Social is an Effective Sales Channel.  We’ve always known that social media has a tremendous influence on our purchase decisions, but its actual business impact has been unclear.  When social marketing is focused on product attributes, with the right targeting, cultivation and measurement practices, it can be a highly effective sales channel for brands.

Social media is used many different ways in an organization. Each department has their own communication goals, so their metrics of success should reflect that.  If you are in marketing and looking to support the sales effort of the company, then social media can be an effective tool for driving sales.  With the right practices, it can be managed and measured the same way you evaluate marketing investments in every other media format.   As we’ve seen from this data, often its social media that comes out on top.

ReTweet